Wilmington Junior Football League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
753216889
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Wilmington, IL, USA
Phone
7082593418
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$131,217
Expenses
$99,434
Assets
$52,205
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON STRONG (PRESIDENT)
  • JOELL RIVERA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KELLI IZZI (TREASURER)
  • JASON STRONG (PRESIDENT)
  • ERIN MORAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nbsp; wilmington nbsp; jr nbsp; football nbsp; exists nbsp; for nbsp; the nbsp; benefit nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; children nbsp; of nbsp; this nbsp; and nbsp; nearby nbsp; communities nbsp; the nbsp; wilminton nbsp; junior nbsp; football nbsp; leach nbsp; teaches nbsp; these nbsp; area nbsp; children nbsp; the nbsp; fundamentals nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; game nbsp; as nbsp; well nbsp; as nbsp; how nbsp; to nbsp; react nbsp; with nbsp; their nbsp; teammates nbsp; and nbsp; coaches nbsp; to nbsp; teach nbsp; good nbsp; sportsmanship nbsp; and nbsp; develop nbsp; the nbsp; youth nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; community nbsp; to nbsp; become nbsp; upstanding nbsp; citizens

What it reported doing in 2019

Sponsorships within the community provides business support in developing the youth of the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 60.9%; rating input score 61
  • Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 60.9% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.