Willow Montessori Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821722604
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Kansas City, MO, USA
- Phone
- 9139080299
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $313,509
- Expenses
- $361,668
- Assets
- $30,819
- Liabilities
- $136,199
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARTHA DENNINGTON (President)
Highest reported compensation
- MARTHA DENNINGTON (President): $66,731 total reported compensation
- ERICA DENNINGTON (Program director): $50,312 total reported compensation
- ALYSSA WISE (Operations director): $40,393 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create a prepared environment where a child feels confident to discover naturally. Through a desire to connect with the earth, community and individuals by applying the Montessori principals.
What it reported doing in 2018
Montessori Education
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 20%; rating input score 20; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.42; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 45%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 68.8% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 5 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $362K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 5 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $840 reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.