Williamson Medical Center Volunteer Auxiliary Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753211774
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Franklin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6157907541
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,071
- Expenses
- $55,681
- Assets
- $174,749
- Liabilities
- $4,133
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAM HAZELWOOD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAM HAZELWOOD (PRESIDENT)
- JERRALD BATTE (VICE PRESIDE)
- BRENDA YOUNG (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization is to serve as williamson medical center's official volunteer organization, to provide support to the facility's staff in day-to-day operations, and to raise funds to benefit the medical center's patients and programs.
What it reported doing in 2020
The volunteers provide many services at the medical center including staffing the volunteer phone at the information desk, delivering flowers to patients and free juice and coffee to patients' families, providing toys for children undergoing surgery, and operating the gift shoppe. The volunteer auxiliary also sponsors the annual tree of life celebration during the christmas season as well as other fundraising events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 97.1%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 81.8%; rating input score 82; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.14; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 97.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $54K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.