William B Kessler Memorial Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
221739910
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2010
Forms available
Form 990 2010
Location
Hammonton, NJ, USA
Phone
6095616701
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Hospital, General

Reported finances

Revenue
$615,543
Expenses
$1,749,513
Assets
$2,006,287
Liabilities
$19,448,674

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

William B. Kessler Memorial Hospital ("Hospital") was established in 1964 to provide for the care of patients suffering from illness, injury or diseases through permanent inpatient acute facilities for the diagnosis, detection, and treatment of such illnesses, injuries or disease. In concert with the provision of inpatient services, outpatient and/or in-the-home care or self-care programs shall be provided. Provision of educational activities related to rendering care of those who are infirmed, and to the general establishment, promotion, and maintenance of health within the community serviced shall be included as well. On March 12, 2009 the Hospital ceased operating as a full service hospital. Since March 13, 2009 the Hospital has leased space to the AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center to provide emergency room, radiology and lab services to the Hammonton, NJ and surrounding communities as part of the hospital shut down. Full closure of the Hospital is expected in 2011

What it reported doing in 2010

Provide emergency room, radiology and lab services to the Hammonton NJ and surrounding communities. See statement above and Schedule O, Statement 1

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -184.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 9.69; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $86K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $57K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.