Willamette Writers
Legal name: Willamette Writers Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 930758252
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Phone
- 9712005385
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $222,756
- Expenses
- $233,710
- Assets
- $86,452
- Liabilities
- $3,894
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATE RISTAU (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- GAIL PASTERNACK (PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT EMERITUS)
- MAREN ANDERSON (SECRETARY/PRESIDENT)
- RONI STINGER (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATE RISTAU (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $67,094 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Willamette Writers focuses on building an active and vibrant community of diverse writers from all backgrounds and levels of experience.
What it reported doing in 2024
Young willamette writersyoung willamette writers welcomes any students from 13 to 18 years old. Young willamette writers currently offers programming in portland and online. Monthly meetings are free of charge to any student. Multiple monthly meetings, including workshops with published authors and industry professionals, were offered this year. Members also submitted to our young willamette writers yearly journal and attended the willamette writers conference.the timberline reviewthe timberline review is an all-volunteer literary journal. The annual journal publishes selections from various genres of fiction (flash fiction, short story, novella, and novel excerpt), poetry, creativenonfiction, critical commentary (annotation, book review, literary analysis, and craft instruction), visual art and hybrid pieces. Free submissions and opportunities to work on the journal are member benefits. The timberline review was available for sale at events and in bookstores, and authors featured in the journal, including members, were invited to present at public readings.the kay snow writing contestthe kay snow writing contest helps writers reach their professional goals in writing through a broad array of categories, including fiction, non-fiction, and poetry. The contest also encourages student writers, with categories for grade school students and high school students. In addition to cash prizes, winners are listed on the willamette writers website and honored at a ceremony at the willamette writers conference. The dispatchwillamette writers sends out a bi-weekly dispatch to over 6,000 writers with how-to articles, current events, and opportunities for writers and members. Filmlab filmlab is an experimental screenwriting program. In 2024, writers joined our writer's room, led by an industry showrunner, and then saw their collaborative script brought to life on stage with sag-aftra. In 2024, willamette writers began production on the script, helping writers see behind the scenes of the filmmaking process.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.6%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 66.9%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.9%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.7%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 69.6% of revenue deployed · 66.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $156K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.