Wildwood Womens Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932813917
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Yucaipa, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9097258554
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,264
- Expenses
- $166,774
- Assets
- $270,872
- Liabilities
- $1,661
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER FRALEY (President)
People named in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER FRALEY (President)
- SEAN THUILLIEZ (Secretary)
- GARY WINGERD (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Wildwood Women's Center is a non-profit Community Health Resource specializing in pregnancy confirmation and helping those facing unintended pregnancy explore their options. The organization does not provide extended OB/GYN or prenatal care or STD/STI treatment, nor does it perform or refer for abortion services, the abortion pill, emergency contraception, or birth control.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Wildwood Women's Center serves the San Bernardino County area located in southern California. The organization is committed to providing excellent health care and support to women and families. The Wildwood Womens Center joyfully serves clients regardless of age, race, religion, creed, immigration status, or sexual orientation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 53.9%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -61.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -122.5% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.1% of revenue deployed · 53.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.