Wildlife Protection Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883606329
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Rancho Palos Verdes, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3602246366
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Preservation, Protection
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,311
- Expenses
- $11,567
- Assets
- $87,499
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amber M Burroff (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Amber M Burroff (CEO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wildlife Protection Alliance is organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, including wildlife protection, wildlife rescue and rehabilitation support, conservation, environmental education, public awareness initiatives, and support for programs that promote the humane treatment and preservation of wildlife and natural ecosystems. The organization supports activities that advance conservation, environmental stewardship, scientific education, and community engagement through educational programming, conservation support services, rescue and rehabilitation assistance, and partnerships with conservation professionals, educators, and related organizations.
What it reported doing in 2025
Wildlife Rehabilitation & Protection: The organization supported wildlife rescue and rehabilitation activities through funding for rescue operations, veterinary and biologist support services, medical supplies, rehabilitation equipment, rescue transportation, and wildlife care infrastructure. Activities included support for treatment and stabilization of injured or orphaned wildlife, acquisition and repair of rescue and transport equipment, and development of facilities and equipment used for wildlife rehabilitation and conservation support activities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 78
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.7%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.3%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.56; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.