Wilderness Education Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
830245256
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Cheyenne, WY, USA
Phone
9712085751
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,892
Expenses
$46,794
Assets
$71,772

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANDREW WRIGHT (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JAY POST (Trustee)
  • DAVE SPERRY (Chairman)
  • QUINN LINFORD (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The WEA's nonprofit purpose is educational by advancing professionalism of outdoor leaders through standards, training, and credentialing

What it reported doing in 2023

FY 2024, the Wilderness Education Association (WEA) made significant strides in advancing the professionalism of outdoor leaders through our core mission of standards, training, and credentialing. Key achievements include: 1. Membership Growth and Retention: WEA successfully increased its Lifetime Membership base by 23%, demonstrating the value members find in our resources and community. 2. Professional Development Initiatives: WEA offered multiple professional development opportunities, including the International Conference on Outdoor Leadership 2024 (ICOL 2024), Outdoor Leadership Experience (OLE), Outdoor Leadership Training Course (OLTC), and Certified Outdoor Leader (COL) courses. enrolled over 200 individuals enrolled representing the U.S., Canada, China, Ireland, Japan, the Philippines, and Taiwan. These initiatives fostered skill development and enhanced the professional capabilities of outdoor educators. 3. Strategic Alliances: We nurtured strategic alliances with key stakeholders, resulting in collaborative efforts to promote standards in outdoor leadership. These partnerships have contributed to the recognition of WEAs curriculum and credentialing process as industry benchmarks. 4. Research and Advocacy: WEA hosted two keynote speakers, 11 general sessions, five practical sessions, two research sessions, and a post-conference session at ICOL 2024. These sessions focused on outdoor living skills, planning and logistics, risk management, environmental integration, education, leadership, judgment and decision-making. We also collaborated with the Journal of Outdoor, Recreation, Education Leadership (JOREL) in advocacy efforts to promote outdoor education, education, and leadership at the national level. 5. Community Engagement: The WEA National Office and Executive Chair participated in the 30th Annual Adventure Education Conference. Through a range of community-focused events and activities, WEA enhanced its visibility and presence within the industry. Additionally, the WEA ICOL Auction raised $1,080 for the Scholarship Fund, showcasing our community's commitment to supporting the next generation of outdoor leaders. These achievements underscore WEAs commitment to advancing the field of outdoor leadership and ensuring that our standards and training programs continue to support the growth and professionalism of outdoor educators

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 93
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.53; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.