Wildcats Debate Parent's Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263704815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Davie, FL, USA
Phone
9542964282
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$46,342
Expenses
$45,811
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDI D'AZEVEDO CIMERBERG (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SANDI D'AZEVEDO CIMERBERG (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary mission of the organization is to support the western high school debate program.

What it reported doing in 2022

The organization supports the western high school debate program by funding its travel, accommodations and other associated expenses to local and out- of-state tournaments, and for professional coaching and further education not provided by the school for various debate events. The club also funds a banquet and awards ceremony at the end of each school year. The membership is comprised of parents of current debate team members but is open to anyone wishing to support the debate team. The funds are used solely to fund the travel and accommodations for tournaments. A small portion is used to pay other tournament associated expenses, such as, registration and coaching fees. Funds are sometimes used to supplement travel for students who may not otherwise afford to participate. Finally, the club funds a year-end awards banquet by selling tickets to cover the costs. Form 990-ez, part v, information regarding personal benefit contracts: the organization did not, during the year, receive any funds, directly, or indirectly, to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract. The organization did not, during the year, pay any premiums, directly, or indirectly, on a personal benefit contract.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.5%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 55.2%; rating input score 55

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.5% of revenue deployed · 55.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.