Wildcat Athletic Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204092206
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Sulphur Springs, TX, USA
Phone
9032850824
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,047
Expenses
$88,346
Assets
$79,159

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • David Fenton (President)

People named in this filing

  • David Fenton (President)
  • David McCaig (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Wildcat Athletic Booster Club is a non-profit organization formed for the purpose of promoting and enhancing the athletic programs of the high school and middle school of the Sulphur Springs Independent School District (SSISD). The Wildcat Athletic Booster Club shall strive to indirectly enhance the educational environment of all SSISD students by supporting and supplementing the SSISD's athletic programs. Its goals as an organization include (but not limited to) the following: To promote and boost community spirit, pride and tradition in SSISD Wildcat athletics; To encourage community attendance, participation and sponsorship of SSISD athletic events; To promote and publicize SSISD Wildcat athletics; To encourage good sportsmanship and the development of team unity among SSISD athletes; To provide support, financial and otherwise, to SSISD athletic programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.