Wildcare Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731461935
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Noble, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4058729338
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Sanctuary, Refuge
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,508,131
- Expenses
- $1,010,621
- Assets
- $2,018,106
- Liabilities
- $107,821
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNI SMITH (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HANNAH ANDRUS (BOARD MEMBER)
- DR JOSHUA BLYDEN (BOARD MEMBER)
- TOM COOPER (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wildcare foundation provides people a place to bring native wildlife struggling to survive with the goal of releasing healthy individuals back into the wild.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wildcare accepted 8,417 animal patients representing 208 distinct species in 2024. The survival and release rate of animals surviving the first 24 hours in care was 58% for all mammal patients, 63% for all bird species, 60% for all amphibian patients, and 87% for reptile patients with an overall survival rate of 61% above the national average of 50%. Caring members of the public rescue animals struggling to survive from across the entire state of Oklahoma; they bring them to wildcare because they are injured, ill, or orphaned. The veterinary team or senior rehabilitation staff assess each animal's condition, and then staff provide appropriate medical care, housing, and food. Staff care for and monitor each animal patient daily until they are fully developed or healed-they are then released back into the wild for a second chance at life. Wildcare manages a large portfolio of landowners that make available large swaths of land onto which patients are released. Wildcare remained opened 365 days in 2024, admitting the second highest number of animals in the organization's history due continued efforts to remain open, maintain adequate staff levels, and use newly developed animal care protocols to ensure animals, staff, and volunteers were kept as safe as possible. Wildcare provided over 100 educational events in 2024 reaching 6,278 people. Wildcare continued to operate its wildlife helpdesk responding to 21,194 calls in 2024. In 2024, 94 volunteers donated 4,671 hours of service to wildcare with its eleven-member, all- volunteer board of directors donating an estimated 288 hours.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $62.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $959K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.