Wildblue Charitable Neighbors Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352831918
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2024
- Location
- Fort Myers, FL, USA
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,826
- Expenses
- $110,714
- Assets
- $86,622
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Melissa Metzger (President)
- Deborah Nolan (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Melissa Metzger (President)
- Deborah Nolan (Vice President)
- Maureen Humes (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
As a 100% volunteer run organization our mission is to unite our neighbors to extend a helping hand to local charities and non-profits by raising awareness fundraising and volunteer service. We raise funds to provide grants to other IRS Section 501c3 organizations in Lee County Florida. We also provide volunteer organizations to our grantee non-profits and help them to raise awareness of their services and needs within our community.
What it reported doing in 2025
In our second year we were able to raise over $150,000 and provide grants totaling $106,000 to nine IRS Section 501c3 organizations focusing on Hunger and Housing Youth Education and Development Seniors and Veterans Womens Resources and Animal Welfare. The surplus was carried over for distribution in 2026. We also provided over 300 hours of volunteer services to these organizations. We raised money by our annual appeal at year end and by hosting a Pickleball Tournament FUNraiser and "Tee It Up for Charity" golf tournament. We are a 100% volunteer run organization. Our objective is to maximize the amount of donations that are distributed to the charities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.2%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 4
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.2% of revenue deployed · 3.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.