Wilcox Dads Grads & Moms Booster Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261243199
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Santa Clara, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4083201794
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $151,095
- Expenses
- $170,918
- Assets
- $147,963
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARC LUND (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARC LUND (PRESIDENT)
- MIKE KARAS (TREASURER)
- DJUNA ARCHER (1ST VP & SE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide additional funding for athletics, academics, scholarships and social clubs operated through the associated student body of wilcox high school. Most of the fundraising activities are conducted at school events.
What it reported doing in 2025
Through the various fundraising activities dgm has been able to avoid school cuts to athletics, provided needed equipment for academics, and provide scholarships to graduating seniors to further their education. Funds paid to other organizaitons are for cost sharing in support of the school. Scholarships paid to seniors are to pay for post graduate education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 99
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.87; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $170K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.