Wichita Rowing Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 510176810
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3162595812
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $63,383
- Expenses
- $91,435
- Assets
- $414,232
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ETHAN GONDERS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ETHAN GONDERS (PRESIDENT)
- IRMA PUSKAREVIC (BOARD MEMBER)
- JANET WOLLMANN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To operate and maintain a rowing association to instruct and promote rowing as an athletic endeavor publicizing the manifold advantages of rowing as a means of health and physical development.
What it reported doing in 2024
To promote the sport of rowing to south-central Kansas through personal skill instruction in learn-to-row classes, to provide continuing skill education throughout the year to members, and to purchase/maintain rowing equipment to allow persons of all skill levels to enjoy the sport. To provide competitive skill-testing of athletes and to convene rowers of all ages and skills through social and skill-testing regattas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 32
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.3%; rating input score 36
- Program expense ratio: 25.1%; rating input score 25
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -44.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.53; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 36.3% of revenue deployed · 25.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.