Wichita High School East Endowment Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
882661094
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3166488460
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,488
Expenses
$565
Assets
$259,391

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRIAN RHODES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIAN RHODES (PRESIDENT)
  • SARA RICHARDSON (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHERYL ELLIS (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Purposes of the corporation include support of the teaching, research and public service missions of wichita high school east, its students, faculty and staff by partnering with donors to enhance the educational experience of students, and provide philanthropic support to build a greater wichita high school east. To seek, receive, hold, invest and administer contributions, gifts, grants, trusts, devises, and bequests of real or personal property, or both, to borrow money, and to make expenditures for the purposes, set forth within the articles of incorporation to the extent consistent with the requirements of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization continues to provide a mission of support for the teaching, research and public service missions of wichita high school east, its students, faculty and staff.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.4%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 459.1; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 76.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -32.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.