Wichita Habitat for Humanity

Legal name: Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
581735540
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Wichita, KS, United States
Phone
(316) 269-0755
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,662,450
Expenses
$4,610,656
Assets
$10,555,638
Liabilities
$536,804

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DANIELLE JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $102,368 total reported compensation
  • KIMBERLY CRABTREE (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $94,418 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We believe in a world where everyone has a decent place to live. By building and improving homes, we create strong and stable communities. The Accounting Specialist supports the Finance department across accounts payable, accounts receivable, ReStore operations, construction accounting, and general financial reporting. This role ensures accurate, timely, and compliant financial records while partnering closely with multiple teams across the organization. This is a mission-driven role where attention to detail, accuracy, and organization directly support affordable housing in Wichita. _Note: This posting redirects to Indeed. If the Indeed link is no longer active, the position is closed and is no longer accepting applications._.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. We had 17 families work alongside volunteers to build safe, affordable homes they purchased on zero percent interest mortgages. Through our homeownership program, these families - which include 33 adults and 35 children - achieved stability and independence. New construction was concentrated in blighted areas of northeast wichita, leveraging existing infrastructure and fostering community revitalization. We also expanded our efforts to the south-central area of wichita, constructing seven new homes on vacant plots of land, thereby building a stronger community. In addition, we partnered with 30 qualified families to provide essential home repair services throughout sedgwick county, ensuring homeowners can continue to live in safe and decent homes for years to come.2. Wichita habitat for humanity empowered local families and individuals by offering comprehensive support in the pursuit of homeownership. Through providing expert guidance on budgeting, credit repair, debt reduction, and home retention, we enabled our family partners with financial control. In addition, our educational classes were open to the public to empower all families in our community. We offered over 36 free educational classes and had a combined attendance of 684 attendees. Our general homebuyer informational meetings were attended by 313 people in search of more affordable housing options in sedgwick county.3. At wichita habitat for humanity, our volunteers do more than just build homes or help at restore; they are the driving force behind creating vibrant, inclusive communities. Over 2,445 dedicated volunteers poured their energy into our mission. They contributed an incredible 24,563 hours to construction and home rehabilitation across sedgwick county, and an additional 6,295 non-construction hours, including invaluable support at restore wichita. Every hour given directly shapes a stronger, more connected community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.1%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.29; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 74.1% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $102K · 25 people listed
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.