Wichita Falls Area Food Bank
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751812865
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Wichita Falls, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9407662322
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $19,658,199
- Expenses
- $10,850,216
- Assets
- $18,165,184
- Liabilities
- $102,591
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID O'NEIL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID O'NEIL (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $82,731 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
"strengthening communities to fight hunger with food, education, and advocacy"
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization served 12 counties in north Texas and distributed 5.1m pounds of food through internal programs and a network of over 90 community partners. Additional statistics: i. 1.5m pounds of food-industry donations ii. 1.6m pounds of produce distributed iii. 78,000 kids' cafe meals served iv. 56,000 powerpaks4kids bags distributed v. 840 health screenings provided by united regional hospital vi. 120 nutrition education classes and events taught vii. 540 neighbors assisted with social services viii. 10,000 hours of volunteer time donated
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.8%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $42.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 44.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.67; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.8% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 13 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $1.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.