Wichita County Medical Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352173373
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wichita Falls, TX, USA
Phone
9404005243
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,288
Expenses
$58,610
Assets
$115,407
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHERRY WHITLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRYSTAL OHMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DR SORIN POJOGA (DIRECTOR OF MEMBERSHIPS)
  • CHRISTINE KERN (DIRECTOR OF SCHOLORSHIPS)
  • SIR TITO TOLENTINO (DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL MISSION)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assist in programs that improve the health and quality of life of all people by promoting health education, encouraging volunteers in activities that meet health needs, supporting health related charitable endeavors, promoting fellowship within the medical community to enhance cooperation in the wichita county medical alliance's medical missions and projects and to support programs of the Texas medical association alliance and the american medical association alliance.

What it reported doing in 2025

Wichita county medical alliance (wcma) scholarships - wcma provides scholarships to students and residents from local counties. Wcma represents wichita, archer, clay and knox counties. The recipient of the scholarship must be a resident of at least one year of the counties served and must be a full-time student pursuing a degree at an institution of higher education in the state of Texas. Anyone eligible to be a member of the wcma and family members of those who are eligible to be members in the wcma are ineligible to receive scholarships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.1%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.