Wichita Animal Action League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465635359
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3162507939
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,831,244
Expenses
$1,504,664
Assets
$853,994
Liabilities
$59,851

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTINA FISCHER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • CHRISTINA FISCHER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $88,115 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Wichita animal action league is an action oriented group dedicated to rescuing animals in crisis within the sedgwick county, Kansas area.

What it reported doing in 2025

Founded in november of 2013, waal's mission is to prevent and mitigate crisis for animals, their owners and our community by offering programs for people and their pets that are targeted at:1. Wichita animal action league is an action-oriented group dedicated to reducing pet overpopulation and preventing & mitigating crisis for animals within in the sedgwick co, ks area.2. Providing education and support for responsible pet ownership, thereby empowering families to provide safe, loving environments for their pets.3. Fostering and adoptive placement of at-risk pets, ensuring that they find homes where they can bring joy and companionship.4. Helping families keep their pets, preventing unnecessary shelter surrenders and preserving the vital emotional support and well-being that pets provide to their owners.in 2025 we accomplished the following towards supporting this mission.1. Completed 4,291 spay/neuter surgeries on dogs & cats through our spay if forward program. 2. Brought 1,268 animals into our organization, cared for them in foster homes and adopted out 1,235 animal into loving homes. 3. Assisted 51 people suffering in domestic violence situations and veterans needed in house treatment with temporary housing for their pets through our safe paws alliance program. 4. Assisted 350 animals that were living in poor conditions or generally neglected through our welfare assistance program. 5. Distributed over 250,000 lbs of pet food to people in need through our pet food bank.6. Provided low cost vet are via our alpha (affordable local pet health assistance to 541 animals. 7. Waal's pets for life (pfl) and animal care collective (acc) programs are dedicated to keeping pets in loving homes and out of shelters by providing resources and education to families in the planeview and hilltop communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.9%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 26.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.9% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 11 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $260K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.