Whole Health Outreach

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431577997
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2021
Forms available
Form 990 2021
Location
Ellington, MO, USA
Phone
5736637757
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$441,565
Expenses
$391,989
Assets
$237,185
Liabilities
$780

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUDY RUSSELL (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHERINE HART (EXECUTIVE DI): $25,641 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organizations primary exempt purpose is to provide preventive health care services and health education. The objective is to respond to the rural health crisis among a traditionally underserved population. A team of volunteer and staff health professionals and lay health care managers provide direct health care services through community-based group activities, individual home visits, and short-term residential care and support services to the elderly, at-risk families, and women and children affected by abuse and violence. Direct health services and education support the prevention and self-management of chronic disease. An evidence-based sexual abuse prevention and education program, known as darkness to light - stewards of children is provided to school staffs, churchs and community organizations. The purpose is to teach adults to recognize and respond appropriately to child sexual abuse and to create safe environments for children. The organization serves some 1,435 program par

What it reported doing in 2021

Domestic violence shelter and support services: safe shelter, food, clothing, and other necessities, crisis counseling, employment and housing assistance, limited medical care and financial assistance, court advocacy, parenting support, grief counseling and guidance (in the school setting) to children and teens-at-risk. Community outreach includes darkness to light: stewards of children program offered to churches, school staffs, and community organizations. (prevention of childhood sexual abuse)

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 72% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.7%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 78.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $29,003.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.7% of revenue deployed · 78.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $308K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2009 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.