Whole Child Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814157535
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Upton, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5086031711
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $166,815
- Expenses
- $191,592
- Assets
- $10,980
- Liabilities
- $18,250
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bonnie Delongchamp LSW CAS MMFT (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Keriann Kimball M Ed CAS (Founder and Chairperson)
- Loubaina Buxamusa PhD OTRL (Director)
- Nancy Andrews (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of The Whole Child, Inc. is to support the healthy (cognitive, social/emotional, physical) development of children and to empower their families through education, opportunity, coaching, and consultation.
What it reported doing in 2020
We are dedicated to empowering the youth of our community with the broad skills needed to live a happy life in today's world. These skills include communication, social emotional, self advocacy, sensory motor, student and organization skills, human relations and health knowledge. Ways we support the healthy development of children and empower families include Social Skill Groups and Social Coaching for ages 5 through 17, Parenting and Family Coaching, Sensitive Fitness, Yoga and Mindfulness, Specialized Tutoring including Executive Function Support, Art Experiences for all ages and abilities, Educational Consultation, Collaboration with Pediatricians, Schools, Daycare Providers, Behavioral Health Specialists.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 70.5%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.66; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.2%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 81% of revenue deployed · 70.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.