Whitestown Youth Hockey Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222632047
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Whitesboro, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3155255489
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $124,493
- Expenses
- $132,989
- Assets
- $82,729
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jason Zima (President)
- Kyle Simpson (Vice President)
- Ben Vennero (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jason Zima (President)
- Kyle Simpson (Vice President)
- Ben Vennero (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to operate a youth hockey program under which its players will not only learn hockey fundamentals and develop hockey skills, but also incorporate the importance of sportsmanship, fair play, and team work, while providing an environment where all the necessary elements are present to build and nurture the players' development into upstanding members of their community.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization maintains and operates a comprehensive youth hockey program accessible to all interested youth in Whitestown, New York, and surrounding communities. Provided structured athletic development and skill instruction to approximately 150 skaters across seven distinct age and proficiency levels: Learn to Skate, Learn to Play, Mite, Squirt, Peewee, Bantam, and Midget. The program design systematically promotes physical fitness, fundamental hockey skills, sportsmanship, fair play, and teamwork in a structured environment
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.5%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 87.5%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.5% of revenue deployed · 87.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.