Whitehead's Wishes
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990829897
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Monaca, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4124676414
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,282
- Expenses
- $15,150
- Assets
- $8,634
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JORDAN WHITEHEAD (PRESIDENT)
- ANTONIA WHITEHEAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO)
People named in this filing
- JORDAN WHITEHEAD (PRESIDENT)
- ANTONIA WHITEHEAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO)
- GREG WHITEHEAD (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Whitehead's wishes is a non profit charitable organization that was established to provide opportunities for youth to enhance their creative endeavors within the arts, athletics, and academics. We will assist youth or programs by providing financial assistance, as well as attend their events to show support. Our dream is that their dream can be fulfilled by developing their skills now to obtain scholarships or advanced training in the future.
What it reported doing in 2025
Physical health - advocate and provide resources to residents with unequal opportunities with the resources for physical health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20.7%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 20
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -150.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -72.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20.7% of revenue deployed · 19.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.