White Swan Arts & Recreation Committee
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204210099
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- White Swan, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5098742946
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys and Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $158,795
- Expenses
- $38,732
- Assets
- $150,353
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHAWNA YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHAWNA YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
- NANCY DONATO (VICE PRES)
- TONDA LAWRENCE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To serve the youth in white swan through providing safe drug free activities
What it reported doing in 2020
Sponsored youth educational programs, after school and summer programs, and community events to encourage the development of arts and culture and provide drug-free activities for the youth of white swan.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.4%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.6%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.88; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 42.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.