White Rose Educational Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203190654
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Portland, OR, USA
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $107,074
- Expenses
- $71,820
- Assets
- $101,856
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LINDA HARRIS (PRESIDENT)
- M YVONNE WILLIAMS (SECRETARY)
- JOHNNIE M REED BROADOUS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The white rose educational fund's primary exempt purpose is to: 1. Award grants to other non-profit organizations for educational purposes. 2. Make scholarship donations to deserving students based on their academic achievements and financial needs. 3. Advance the educational growth of students through scholarships, education, cultural and civic opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2025
The white rose educational fund gave 12,000 in scholarships; and donated 30,000 to other organizations, during the year ended december 31, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.7%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.7% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $68K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.