White House Band Boosters
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621662414
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- White House, TN, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,814
- Expenses
- $40,892
- Assets
- $32,179
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROB URFER (President)
- ANGELA DOBBS (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- ROB URFER (President)
- ANGELA DOBBS (Vice President)
- PETER BUCHANAN (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
White house band boosters operates under the guidelines of the white house high school, which promotes the objectives of the white house band boosters. The objectives of the white house bank boosters are to provide financial assistance, to morally support the activities of the bands and to encourage community interest in the band programs while remaining non-sectarian and non-partisan.
What it reported doing in 2024
The marching band, made up of 66 musicians, 18 color guard, and 2 drum majors, spent two weeks prior to the beginning of the school year learning marching fundamental and music for the 2024 marching season. The band performed at home and away football games. They marched in the annual homecoming parade as well as the Christmas parade. They also participated in five marching band competitions, including the State Division II Championship. The concert band, comprised of approximately 70 students performed at the Veterans Day concert, a winter community concert that included all White Houes Middle School and High School bank students as well as several alumni. Additionally, the Band hosted a spring ensemble concert and an end of year full band concert. Students also had the opportunity to be involved in a jazz ensemble and a percussion ensemble throughout the spring semester. Many of our students also auditioned for Mid-State and All-State Honor Bands as well as a few college honor bands.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.9%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.