White Bird Rock Medicine

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934880868
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Eugene, OR, USA
Phone
5419126842
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$183,579
Expenses
$156,369
Assets
$92,582
Liabilities
$7,433

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIM MOLLMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KATHRYN GILLESPIE (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • TIM MOLLMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • CHUCK SVE (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

White bird rock medicine is a philanthropic, volunteer-centered organization, providing emergency medical and crisis response at special events and in non-traditional settings to raise funds in support of the basic needs and social justice efforts taking place in our community.

What it reported doing in 2025

White bird rock medicine's medical and behavioral health volunteers dedicated thousands of volunteer hours in 2025, providing care and support to over 10,000 participants at events throughout Oregon. With the support of our volunteer professionals, white bird rock medicine was able to donate 14,000 of our event medicine proceeds to three organizations supporting underserved individuals in our community in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.8%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 92.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $156K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.