Whidbey Watershed Stewards
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911656570
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Langley, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3605791272
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fisheries Resources
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,315
- Expenses
- $80,034
- Assets
- $548,830
- Liabilities
- $13,112
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA LAVATY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARIE BERGSTROM (SECRETARY)
- LEE CHAVEZ (PAST PRESIDE)
- ROBERT GENTZ (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Whidbey watershed stewards promotes nearshore and watershed health by linking water, land, wildlife, and people on whidbey island through education, research, and restoration.
What it reported doing in 2024
Education: working closely with the south whidbey school district, several natural science educational programs were developed. In the spring, various public and private schools attended grade appropriate k to 6th grade classes in their schools and at whidbey watershed stewards' outdoor classroom. These classes centered around "habitats and creatures", where students broken up into small groups explored the forest and stream ecosystems and the plants and creatures who live in them. Approx. 751 students from 8 different schools. In the fall, grades 1st through 5th and 8th students participated in classroom programs and field trips to the outdoor classroom that explored our fascinating "digging deeper into the forest". This program invites students on a journey into the heart of our forest ecosystem. Each lesson offers a hands-on exploration of life beneath the forest canopy, from tiny soil-dwelling organisms to fascinating fungi. Students rotated through various hands-on learning activities appropriate for their grade level. Approx. 465 students across 5 schools. During july and august two different summer camp programs, in partnership with the south whidbey parks and recreation, were developed. The "feathered friends" for ages 6 through 8 explored was conducted at the outdoor classroom. The salish sea jr. Scientists", for ages 9 through 12, was conducted at the environmental education center and langley marina. 27 students. Salmon in the classroom program: instructed 3rd and 5th grade students about the life cycle of salmon. Salmon eggs were provided to the school and reared in the school aquariums in conjunction with salmon life cycle lessons. When the fish hatched and reached fry stage, they were released in march by groups of students with their teachers and families into maxwelton creek at the outdoor classroom. Approx. 50 students. Community education was provided to the public through various family- oriented events held on whidbey island, and also in newsletters, website, and social media.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.1%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 66.2%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $149.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.86; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.1% of revenue deployed · 66.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.