Wheels 4 Paws 4 Ever Homes Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462520786
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Cordova, NC, USA
Phone
9109950303
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$95,758
Expenses
$95,459
Assets
$4,624

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Pat Webb (Founder and President)
  • Ron Webb (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Pat Webb (Founder and President)
  • Ron Webb (Vice President)
  • Beth Kinder Rubin (Secretary Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Rescue and Transport of At-Risk (dogs/cats) from Shelters to Rescues, Fosters or Adopters. Our "mission" it to have every person care for one fur baby, be it monetarily, physically or by volunteering. We can save them from abuse, neglect and abuse, and educate about the proper care of companion animals, to include applicable vaccinations, spay/neuter programs. We will pull from shelters and foster in emergencies, and arrange for betting, if needed, until more permanent fostering, adoption or rescue is possible. We will connect with as many organizations as humanely possible to save the ones that are at immediate risk and facilitate the needed education for proper care, vetting and treatment of all animals. We will be their VOICE.

What it reported doing in 2015

The organization has no set program services, but combined in each transport that we do. We have traveled nearly 505,000 miles since organized and transported approximately 6,300 dogs/cats. During the previous fiscal year, April 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2016, we traveled approximately 220,000 miles, transporting 2,500 animals and contributing to proper vetting and spay and neuter of approximately 250.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.8%; rating input score 42
  • Program expense ratio: 41.9%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.8% of revenue deployed · 41.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.