Wheelchairs Against Guns Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464304659
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9176542897
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $522,770
- Expenses
- $527,405
- Assets
- $1,356
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAREEM NELSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND COO)
Highest reported compensation
- KASANDRA FORMAN (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $19,205 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to protect at-risk youth from the dangers of bullying, gangs, and gun violence by teaching them conflict resolution strategies, critical thinking, positive self-esteem building, and financial literacy
What it reported doing in 2025
Education, Training and Transportation services for program participants to ensure equal access to culturally enriching programs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for grants.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.2%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 24%; rating input score 24
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -38.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -37.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.2% of revenue deployed · 24% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $127K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $19K · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.