Wheel Serve NC

Legal name: Wheel Serve Nc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
845073519
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Charlotte, NC, US
Phone
7045163785
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Special Olympics

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,678
Expenses
$68,117
Assets
$96,577
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA WEYGANDT (PAST PRESIDENT (NON-VOTING))
  • KELLY FLOUHOUSE (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • HELEN LEONARD (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CANDY PEGRAM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SHANE MOUBRY (BOARD MEMBER)
  • SANDRA HOLUB (BOARD MEMBER)
  • LAURA WEYGANDT (PAST PRESIDENT (NON-VOTING))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To grow, promote and support wheelchair tennis in North Carolina.

What it reported doing in 2025

Workman player grant, program grant & court reservation/lesson grant.these grants provide the player/program financial support by reimbursing expenses related to previously purchased equipment, tennis supplies, tennis events, tournaments and transportation/mileage. The wsnc program grant offers each program location reimbursement of $450/year for tennis related needs. There are 2 cycles of the wpg per year for reimbursement of $400/cycle (30 grants per year). The lesson/court reservation grant is an annual reimbursement of $100 (15 grants available). Mileage reimbursement is offered to eligible out-of-town wsnc players at the volunteer rate of $.35/mile for all wsnc sponsored events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 64
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.5%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 63.3%; rating input score 63

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.6%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 8 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 52.5% of revenue deployed · 63.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.