Wheatland Athletic Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990486820
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Wheatland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5308706856
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,472
- Expenses
- $790
- Assets
- $20,723
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Laura Holley (President)
- Bryan Rivers (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Laura Holley (President)
- Megan Stutler (Treasurer)
- Bryan Rivers (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
An all-volunteer organization committed to helping the Wheatland Union High School Football Program succeed in supporting players and coaches. We provide moral and financial support to achieve both academic and athletic excellence. Our mission is to positively support, promote, and enhance the experience of Pirate Football for its student-athletes, coaches, and families.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization supported the high school football program, benefiting approximately 100 student-athletes and coaching staff. Funds were used to enhance player participation and program operations, including support for equipment, uniforms, training needs, and team-related expenses. Key accomplishments included funding additional athletic training with a personal trainer, providing new team jerseys, and supplying necessary training and game day equipment.The program's purpose was to strengthen student engagement, athletic development, and team experience for participants involved in the football program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 94.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.23; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.