Whats Your Forte Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464290311
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Tempe, AZ, USA
Phone
4808005360
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,585
Expenses
$111,321
Assets
$295,021
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Matt Forte (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jamia Jowers (Executive Dir.): $80,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Foundation's mission is designed to uplift, impact and empowers today's youth by establishing a sense of community, providing resources to further education, and creating mentorship opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2013, matt forte, all pro running back for the chicago bears established the matt forte foundation with his co-founder and wife danielle forte after learning that 14.7 % of chicago's high school dropouts were incarcerated, and nearly 42,000 teens did not receive high school diplomas. As a catalyst for change, and to meet the ever-growing need for wrap-around support in southside and westside neighborhoods in chicago, the foundation expanded programming from scholarships for higher education to directly facilitating ongoing programming in violence prevention, mentoring, financial literacy, workforce development programs, and youth empowerment opportunities. The evolution to highly varied, directly operated programming. Motivated the name change from "matt forte foundation" to "what's your forte foundation," as it is known today. The what's your forte foundation's mission is to invest in the equitable economic advancement of youth and families through partnership and purposeful relationships. Our vision is to be a powerful lever for social change, that facilitates transformational development on the south & west sides of chicago. We do this through philanthropy, innovative opportunities, robust engagement, and a continuum of services. The foundation holistically supports the entire community because we are not just about programs but community-based projects. It has been our charge to seek out the forgotten, disconnected (opportunity youth), and marginalized. Centering our outreach on the education of youth in the most underinvested neighborhoods and uplifting the family unit as a whole, we understand that strong families can transform culture in positive ways that last for generations to come. As a proud graduate of tulane university, matt understands the power of education and opportunity and how it changes lives for the better. Matt believes that through awareness, relationship-building and youth -focused empowerment, successful pathways can be chartered, and a transformation of statistics and futures of the youth and communities can be realized.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.5%; rating input score 53
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.1%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 71.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.5% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.