Whats Next Ministry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832140058
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7049078377
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $686,630
- Expenses
- $496,121
- Assets
- $400,381
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
People named in this filing
- Dennis Hammack Jr (Chairman and Board Member)
- David Parr (Vice Chairman and Board Member)
- Kenneth Braxton (Treasurer and Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Whats Next Ministry the Organization or Whats Next is a nonprofit corporation organized and operated exclusively for charitable and religious purposes within the meaning of Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended or any corresponding provision of a successor statute the Code. Whats Nexts mission is to open doors for urban youth by building life-long relationships while providing educational support and life skills to develop character confidence and hope.
What it reported doing in 2025
Academics are important. GPA is important. College is a great goal. However our experience has taught us several lessons about academics as it relates to our young men. Not all are interested in or capable of attending college. College is not the best choice for each young man. Academics can be difficult and a huge negative for some of our young men. School is not only a challenge but can be the most painful part of the day for some. This is why we have developed a unique academic plan for each student. The goal may be accomplishing a task. It may be making up an assignment. It could be to prepare a young man for a college entrance exam. Each student is on a different level due to their academic experiences prior to high school. Our main goal is to develop confidence and instill a work ethic in each student so they take pride in each successful step of their plan. Two days of academic tutoring led by staff and volunteers occur each week. Additional tutoring is available during exam weeks and upon student request. The staff knows each students grades attendance and frequently has discussions with their teachers guidance counselors and parents. This academic support combined with our mental health approach helps grow their confidence level and desire to be better. Our academic support has been influential in helping students attend college become eligible for high school sports develop a skill and most importantly gain self-confidence. A robust support model is available for those students seeking further education after high school. Application support FAFSA student loan guidance school tours and experienced advice from staff and partners help the student choose the appropriate 4-year school community college 2 year junior college or trade school. The Whats Next Wilton Parr Education Endowment offers financial assistance to help cover the cost of student needs and assist in lowering their overall school loans. Expected outcomes for our academic model are as follows : 1. Have at least 1 academic session grade check with a WN Life Coach. 2. No zeros in any class reported on the Power School student report. 3. Less than 9 absences in any class for the semester. 4. Based on the individual the expected GPA can vary from 1.5 to 3.5. 5. Complete 2 IXL self-learning sessions on the IXL software in the WN Academic Success Center these sessions are in math and reading comprehension and all young men have a base line grade level once they enter into the WN organization. 6. High School graduation by age 19. 7. A minimum level of 10th grade math and reading comprehension upon high school graduation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $395K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.