Wharton Rotary Charity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272859623
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Wharton, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2102150452
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,717
- Expenses
- $28,621
- Assets
- $121,350
- Liabilities
- $873
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LINDA KING (PRESIDENT)
- ADRAYLLE WATSON (PRESIDENT EL)
People named in this filing
- LINDA KING (PRESIDENT)
- DESIRE SPEARS (TREASURER)
- CLIFFORD JACKSON (VICE-PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wharton rotary charity, inc. Collects and disburses funds to support the charitable activities and projects of the wharton rotary club.
What it reported doing in 2024
The main fundraiser is an annual gala called legends of western music. Support derived from the gala includes gross receipts from ticket sales, corporate sponsorships, and cash contribuions. Charitable giving includesscholarships paid to wharton county junior college for the benefit of local high school students and contributions to various charitable organizations including the boys & girls club of wharton, just do it now, inc., the rotary foundation, wharton county library summer reading program, wharton county historical museum, a local food bank and numerous others. Number of persons benefited is estimated to be in the thousands.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 91% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.24; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 98.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.