Weymouth Council for the Hungry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043099272
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- East Weymouth, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7813317682
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $788,637
- Expenses
- $774,246
- Assets
- $2,202,446
- Liabilities
- $80,871
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA IARIA (TREASURER): $23,039 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The weymouth food pantry is a neighbor-to-neighbor grassroots project aimed at ensuring food security for financially-struggling families in our town. Utilizing a client choice model, we put our neighbors in charge of their own food choices while also encouraging healthy eating habits. Nourishing neighbor-to-neighbor relations and providing nourishing food for all makes for a stronger weymouth and a better world.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our food pantry provides food to 450 families each month - that's approximately 160,000 meals per year. We are working to combat the high rates of diabetes and obesity in the families we serve by steadily increasing our supply of nutrient dense food choices and encouraging home cooking, especially with fresh produce. The weymouth food pantry offers food deliveries to people with disabilties, the elderly, and families living at a local homeless shelter. With the help of 110 volunteers, this program serves 8090 families each month.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 87.6%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.84; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87% of revenue deployed · 87.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $678K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $23K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.