Wetlands and Wildlife Care Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330969297
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Huntington Beach, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7143745587
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Wildlife Sanctuary, Refuge
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,039,845
- Expenses
- $891,227
- Assets
- $686,856
- Liabilities
- $300
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Debra McGuire (Executive Dir.): $91,845 total reported compensation
- Elizabeth Wood (Chairman): $82,955 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate the public about man's impact on the environment and mitigate that impact through care and rehabilitation of native wildlife.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Wetlands & Wildlife Care Center (WWCC) is dedicated to the rescue, rehabilitation and release of injured and orphaned native wildlife. WWCC is capable of rehabilitating over 1000 animals at a time. We reponded to local emergencies including fire victims and unusual mortality events with seabirds.WWCC is a primary participant-managed facility with the Oiled Wildlife Care Network (OWCN) and is designed to care for up to 400 oiled birds in the event of an oil spill in Southern California.Our 2,625 square-foot Butler building contains areas for bird intake, holding, washing, drying, and recovery, as well as a series of six large and four small pens with pools for bird recovery.Under the supervision and authority of the US Fish and Wildlife Service, abandoned Western Snowy Plover eggs are captive reared at our facility and then released into the wild. The Western Snowy Plover is a threatened/endangered species.WWCC is 1 of only 2 permitted Hummingbird rehabilitation facilities in all of Orange County, CA. More than 600 Hummingbirds come in annually with a release rate higher than the national average. With intensive training and oversight by our species specialists, qualified volunteers provide home care for Hummingbirds. Through telephone counseling, we educate the public about trying first to re-nest or reunite fledglings rather than rescuing them when they might not need to be rescued.In the spring of 2024 WWCC took in 260 starving pelicans. The warming ocean water near the surface has caused the fish to swim deeper than the pelicans can dive after. Once a pelican is stabilized, it costs WWCC $45 per day to feed it.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: $45.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.3%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $815K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.