Westwood Youth Football Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222922517
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Westwood, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 2016960927
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,520
- Expenses
- $93,241
- Assets
- $13,002
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL SANDBERG (CO- PRESIDENT)
- MARDI EKMEKJIAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRACY COOK (CO-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL SANDBERG (CO- PRESIDENT)
- MARDI EKMEKJIAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TRACY COOK (CO-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The volunteer trustees and coaches of cardinals jr football had made a pledge to learn more about the game of football and to seek multiple self-development opportunities that will enhance the player's skills and safety so the players can thrive and succeed.
What it reported doing in 2025
Jr cardinals football is now a member of bcjfl ( the bergen county junior football league). This league was built with fair play and athletes first. Also in the bcjfl are the following programs: closter, cresskill, dumont, glen ridge, hillsdale, hohokus / saddle river, montvale / woodcliff lake, northern valley, norwood / harrington park, park ridge, river vale, tenafly, and waldwick / midland park. The volunteer trustees and coaches of cardinals jr football have made this transition a jumping off point that will allow the program and most importantly the players to thrive and succeed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -36.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.