Westside Samaritans Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900786544
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Gainesville, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3525059101
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,840
- Expenses
- $100,366
- Assets
- $35,746
- Liabilities
- $14,269
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES DIXON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARCELINE BEEM (EXECUTIVE DI)
- JAMES DIXON (PRESIDENT)
- PHILLIP YOUNG (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide medical and dental services to low-income residents who cannot afford conventional medical care. This group includes, but is not limited to, the homeless, migrant workers, disadvantaged students and the uninsured.
What it reported doing in 2017
The clinic provided 215 patient encounters. Services included medical appointments, mental health services, and wellness visits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 24.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.