Westside Neighborhood School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953551091
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3105748650
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Primary, Elementary Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $35,670,716
- Expenses
- $37,097,579
- Assets
- $128,242,461
- Liabilities
- $117,732,354
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRADLEY ZACUTO (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $627,090 total reported compensation
- JOON LEE (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $292,925 total reported compensation
- HEIDI REIMANN (ASSISTANT HEAD OF SCHOOL): $204,109 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation, compassion, and stewardship.
What it reported doing in 2024
Westside neighborhood school (the school) is accredited by the California association of independent schools. The school operates a private preschool, elementary, and middle school, which offers a well-rounded academic curriculum, including language arts, mathematics, science, social studies, physical education, art, music, technology and foreign language. The school's total enrollment in fiscal year 2024-25 is 589. The school embraces a positive, child-centered approach to education that strives to fully develop the potential of each student, intellectually, socially, emotionally, and physically. Our high academic and ethical standards encourage students to take responsibility for their learning and their behavior. Our curriculum is designed to engage students in a highly differentiated, project-based, active learning curriculum that challenges all students to grow. We provide an environment where each child is able to experience success, is confident in taking intellectual risks, where individuals feel valued in their differences and value the differences in others. Our goal is to instill in our students a love of learning and an understanding of our world, and to provide for our teachers and staff an environment of collegiality and professional growth. The school recognizes that children have different learning styles and learn at different rates. Our program is built from the best practices derived from the progressive, developmental and traditional educational philosophies, and employs a variety of experiential age-appropriate activities designed to accommodate students' needs, invite their creativity and challenge their growth. We strive to be a community of lifelong learners, where academic excellence, creativity, sense of humor, independence, self-discipline and high moral standards are valued.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.46; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.92; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 24 of 24 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $627K · 31 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $272K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.