Westside Infant-family Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274018980
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Culver City, CA, USA
Phone
4242251443
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,836,679
Expenses
$4,342,289
Assets
$3,855,926
Liabilities
$864,874

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE DAILEY (PAST BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TIMOTHY SWEENEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TIMOTHY SWEENEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $170,157 total reported compensation
  • SARA E PARNASS (DIRECTOR OF CLINICAL PROGRAMS): $136,231 total reported compensation
  • NASTASSIA J BROWN (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $120,151 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Win empowers families with young children to build resilience and thrive by strengthening relationships within families and communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Across win's services treatment, early intervention, and universal prevention services we reached more than 9,000 individuals in the fiscal year. Win was awarded our first federal grant from the substance abuse and mental health services administration (samhsa), a five-year award as part of the national child traumatic stress initiative. With the samhsa grant, we expanded essential outreach efforts, we've offered comprehensive case management support, and we've implemented evidence-based practices, child-parent psychotherapy, and attachment vitamins.in addition to our core child-parent psychotherapy services, win launched a perinatal mental health program to reach families as early as possible. We trained all of our therapists in advanced perinatal psychotherapy, and trained them to treat perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. All therapists are pursuing pmh-c certification through postpartum support international. Through our work with perinatal clients, we have a unique opportunity to lay a strong foundation for family relational health, priming parents and caregivers to envision and cultivate the kind of relationship they want to have with their child.we also expanded our attachment vitamins (av) group intervention which helps parents with children aged birth-5 years learn about child development and the impact of stress and trauma. In av, parents reflect on their child's experiences and the possible meanings of their child's behaviors to promote secure attachment and safe socialization practices.in the community, win received an la county department of mental health (dmh) united mental health promoters (umhp) contract to address mental health disparities by training community members to become mental health promoters (mhps). Mhps serve as a bridge between the community, dmh, and other human and social service organizations and provide direct prevention services for families with children prenatal to five.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -53.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.6%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $170K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.