Westhampton War Memorial Ambulance Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 116022393
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Westhampton Beach, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6312881760
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,936,917
- Expenses
- $1,285,984
- Assets
- $2,009,292
- Liabilities
- $81
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- BRIAN DANOWSKI-ON 1224 (2ND ASST CHIEF): $57,389 total reported compensation
- JASON KOMAROVSKIY-ON 1224 (DIRECTOR): $35,138 total reported compensation
- RITA WYATT (DIRECTOR): $19,966 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At the westhampton war memorial ambulance association (wwmaa), our mission is to provide high-quality emergency medical care to the residents and visitors of the communities we serve: eastport, speonk, remsenburg, westhampton, westhampton beach, quiogue, quogue, and westhampton dunes. Rooted in tradition and built on volunteerism, we respond swiftly and compassionately to emergencies. Beyond patient care, we are committed to community engagement, education, and ensuring public safety for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
We train and maintain a high level of preparedness so that we may respond to any type of emergency for which emergency medical services are required. We are a group of approximately 48-65 dedicated volunteers providing emergency basic and advanced life support. We are on call 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, ready to respond at a moments notice to all types of medical emergencies whether they are minor or life threatening. We respond to approximately 1,450 emergency medical calls annually, transport individuals to area hospitals and save countless lives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 47.7%; rating input score 48
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 63.6%; rating input score 64; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.6%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 47.7% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $937K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $57K · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.