Westernncsr
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922992533
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Vale, NC, USA
- Phone
- 8282347297
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,701
- Expenses
- $20,471
- Assets
- $7,960
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tammy Walsh (President)
- Joan King (Vice President/Treasurer)
- Trish Jacobs (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Tammy Walsh (President)
- Joan King (Vice President/Treasurer)
- Erin West (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Western NC Sheltie Rescue mission is to promote Shelties/Sheltie Mix to the community by providing safe compassionate homes to them when they find themselves homeless. We will do everything in our power to prevent cruelty, overpopulation and euthanization of a sheltie/sheltie mix and find them a final home best suited for the circumstances of that dog.
What it reported doing in 2025
In our third year of rescue we have found loving homes for 22 dogs, sometimes traveling out of state to rescue them and fostering 26 others. Once in our program they are fully vetted, including updating vaccinations and getting them dentals, spayed/neutered before they go to their forever home. The average cost for vetting is approximately $800 per dog.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.3%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 63.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 42.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 32.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.