Western Plains Buyer's Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332025030
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Muleshoe, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8062829503
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Husbandry
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,381
- Expenses
- $1,175
- Assets
- $16,206
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- COLT ELLIS (DIRECTOR)
- JOHN VILLALBA (DIRECTOR)
- WESLEY MATTHEW DAVIS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide various types of support for programs and events pertaining to raising, showing and sale of farm and ranch stock show animals for the youth of the area. For charitable, benevolent, literary, and educational purposes
What it reported doing in 2024
Western plains buyer's club was formed to support local youth in theirendeavors of working and showing livestock at the local livestock show. This show takes place every february. This being a short year for us, and forming after february 2025, the organization will be meeting our goals beginning in february, 2026.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.8%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 93.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.79; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.