Western Harvest Ministries
Legal name: Western Harvest Ministries Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 450492675
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Weatherford, TX, United States
- Phone
- (817) 995-9087
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $86,880
- Expenses
- $71,734
- Assets
- $86,587
- Liabilities
- $44,041
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT ALAN MENDES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- SCOTT ALAN MENDES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Welcome Western Harvest Ministries and its staff are dedicated to sharing God’s Unconditional love and grace with today’s youth of America. Our vision is to see them lead strong and victorious lives, while they are able to participate in a sport that they truly love. We both challenge and equip them with solid and practical principles from the eternal word of God. We are passionately driven by seeing first hand, the transformation in their lives as we encourage them to fulfill their God given destinies.
What it reported doing in 2025
Faith based christian youth programs through the production and presentation of events and activities, within established guidelines, that young people can apply to reach their life and spiritual goals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 10
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 49
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.7%; rating input score 9
- Program expense ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 11
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 50.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -23.6% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 8.7% of revenue deployed · 10.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.