Western Energy Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840700841
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3036230987
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,127,182
- Expenses
- $2,055,293
- Assets
- $1,144,720
- Liabilities
- $504,501
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
34 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHLEEN SGAMMA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KATHLEEN SGAMMA (PRESIDENT): $394,832 total reported compensation
- AARON JOHNSON (VP PUBLIC AF): $190,683 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL PUCHALSKI (MGR BUSINESS): $126,323 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Working with a vibrant membership base for over 50 years, western energy alliance stands as a credible leader, advocate, and champion of independent oil and natural gas companies in the west. Our expert staff, active committees, and committed board members form a collaborative and welcoming community of professionals dedicated to abundant, affordable energy and a high quality of life for all. Most independent producers are small businesses, with an average of fourteen employees.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy: western energy alliance advocates on behalf of its members regarding federal legislative, regulatory, environmental, public lands and other policy issues that ensure a favorable business climate for the exploration and production sector of the oil and gas industry in the west.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 64% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 89.3%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 45.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 28 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $395K · 34 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $545K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.