Western Carolina Emergency Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331326719
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mebane, NC, USA
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $424,818
- Expenses
- $359,623
- Assets
- $65,195
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER LARSEN (DIRECTOR)
- CRYSTAL SUAZO (CO-TRUSTEE DIRECTOR)
- MINDY TOOLE (CO-TRUSTEE DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Hurricane helene relief for wnc.partnered with multiple organizations and individuals to gather donations, supplies, volunteers, and drivers. Sourcing supplies, water, food, fuel, tanks, & trucks to supply our drivers & teams around the region.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fuel & home heating fuel: multiple individual volunteer drivers with trucks/trailers fitted with totes, pumps, barrels, or gas cans for delivery to victims. Established 12 fuel hub locations with fuel tanks for a combination of kerosene, unleaded, diesel, and/or home heating fuel for victims of hurricane helene. Partnered with local fuel company, prime fuels llc, until 12/5/2024 for supply to 12 locations. Partnered with pert, patriot emergency response team, another 501c3, for delivery of home heating fuel and/or kerosene directly to victims until 12/5/2024. Currently partnerd with operation anchor, another charity in process of obtaining 501c3 status, to supply unleaded fuel for generator use for helene victims still without power due to engineering certification limits for rebuild.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $360K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.