Westedge Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
451998194
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
8435341484
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,513,522
Expenses
$708,592
Assets
$13,519,191
Liabilities
$4,484

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL MAHER (CEO - THROUGH 3/30/25)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL MAHER (CEO - THROUGH 3/30/25): $233,224 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Westedge is a bold economic and urban revitalization vision to advance knowledge-based sectors of the charleston, South Carolina regional economy.

What it reported doing in 2024

The westedge foundation mobilizes and deploys resources to invest in infrastructure to protect the health safety and welfare of the surrounding community and the public at large. We measure our progress in accomplishing this portion of our mission by:- ongoing efforts to address the increasing flooding that impacts the community, damaging property and preventing access to homes, businesses, and schools.- working to eliminate contamination exposures in the area due to degradation of the historic landfill cap, and bring perpetual health improvement to the immediate neighborhood and all of the west side of the peninsula.- improving access and mobility with new or improved auto, bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities.we accomplish our mission through repairing existing infrastructure and building new roads, drainage, and utilities to support the needs of the area of and around the westedge district. Specific accomplishments of westedge foundation's efforts include: flooding:-design and construction to eliminate tidal sunny day flooding and reducing instances of stormwater flooding with new drainage solutions and enhanced stormwater storage capacity already in place or planned.-working to connect existing gadsden green and ashton street drainage systems to the spring fishburne deep tunnel system to reduce neighborhood flooding.-restoring reliable emergency response and evacuation routes.environment:-stopping ongoing health risks from surface exposure to contamination from landfill materials and hazardous leachate.-reducing tidal and stormwater flooding to stop conveyance of contaminants into the neighborhood, protecting gadsden green homes, charleston development academy and harmon field.-sc dhec voluntary cleanup program for all projects ensures future safety for the public and reduces ongoing liability/exposure of the city and muscf.safe access:-traffic improvements already in place improve flow and safety on lockwood blvd. And president st.-proposed medical district connector will create safer pedestrian, bicycle and transit connections to the medical district.-creating new workplaces with direct access to transit & housing significantly reduces traffic impacts.-providing a terminus location for the planned lcrt public transit system, increasing mobility options for an underserved population.-efforts to address flooding also promotes consistent access to homes, workplaces and schools.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 43
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.7%; rating input score 44
  • Program expense ratio: 55.6%; rating input score 56
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.08; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 32.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.7% of revenue deployed · 55.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $394K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $233K · 15 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.