Westchester Putnam School Boards Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133190694
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Harrison, NY, USA
Phone
9143458737
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$300,097
Expenses
$282,413
Assets
$163,236
Liabilities
$14,423

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARJORIE SCHIFF (PRESIDENT)
  • SARAH CARRIER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KAREN BELANGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • KAREN BELANGER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,032 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the westchester putnam school boards association is to provide leadership and support for our member districts. In this role wpsba will:-promote effective school district governance and board governance through training and education.-facilitate communication and the sharing of information.-serve as a resource on public education policy issues.-advocate for legislation that supports public education.-foster relationships with organizations that share common interests and goals.

What it reported doing in 2024

The westchester putnam school boards association (wpsba) has worked to earn a solid reputation as a regional leader on issues related to public education and school district governance. Our strong membership record (100% of area school districts are members) stands as an indicator of the high level of service and resource support we provide. The wpsba executive director is regularly called upon to promote education issues and speak on behalf of public education on panels, roundtables, and other public forums. Our programs are primarily supported through membership dues, as programs are either provided free to members, there is a nominal fee, or the fee covers basic costs for an event. Key program activities in support of the wpsba mission statement include:1. Promoting effective school board service by providing training, workshops and events for local school board members: a. Three programs on governance and current issues for school boards. B. Three training sessions for prospective and newly elected board members, as well as a year-long mentor program for new school board members. C. Two district clerk workshops on issues related to their board of education duties. 2. Providing a forum for the exchange of ideas among board members and facilitating communication and learning among school boards and education professionals: a. Organize two networking sessions for sharing information and perspectives. B. Implement weekly (february through april) school district survey on proposed school district budget and distribute weekly updated results to boards and administrators. C. Collect and analyze data from a variety of sources; distribute state, regional and school district data, as well as items of interest to school boards at meetings, electronically and through posting on the association's website.3. Serving as a resource for information on public education, sharing information related to public education with school districts, community groups, agencies, legislators and the press, and advocating for public education issues. A. Serve as regional voice and a conduit for providing data and background information to school districts, legislators, community members and the press on school governance and public education issues. Regional data and related information are distributed at meetings and electronically and is posted on website. B. Gather information on the impact of federal and state requirements on school budgets and operations, and advocate on issues that affect public education. Regional data and related information are distributed at meetings and electronically and is posted on website. Legislative advocacy committee meetings are held periodically to discuss regional public education issues and advocacy. Local meetings and ny legislator forum on regional public education issues. C. Publish annual "facts & figure$" book of member school district data and profiles. Advertising revenue of $16,350 and hard cost expenditure for publication and mailing of $6,003.books were published for distribution to board members, school administrators, legislators, and community groups/members. The publication is also available online.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $241K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.