Westchester Community College Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237050397
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Valhalla, NY, US
Phone
(914) 606-6670
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,842,390
Expenses
$8,668,657
Assets
$79,863,327
Liabilities
$941,449

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

59 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN ELION WOLLIN (PRESIDENT)
  • ELYSE KLAYMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER GRUENBERG (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MERYL A ALLISON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DOLORES SWIRIN-YAO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DOLORES SWIRIN-YAO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $246,789 total reported compensation
  • JEFF GOLDBERG (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $203,270 total reported compensation
  • ILENE LIEBERMAN (SR. DIR. OF DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP GIFTS): $180,651 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Westchester Community College Foundation provides over $4M in scholarship support and $2-$3M in programmatic support.

What it reported doing in 2024

College institutional enrichment - see schedule ocollege institutional enrichment: in addition to critical support of scholarships, the foundation funded significant programmatic activities including:*simulated hospital lab, which provides state-of-the-art training for students in a wide range of medical fields including nursing and emt, completed construction. *jpmorgan chase foundation's grant enabled the development of a sector partnership strategy to expand current and create new pathways to workforce training in mount vernon, yonkers and new rochelle.*national council for workforce education's grant continued to support financial wellness education campus wide. *con edison bright futures program continued its partnership of more than a decade, opening doors to students for careers in sustainable energy and information technology. *the native plant center teaches sustainable gardening to suny wcc students as well as community-wide learners, which include home gardeners, landscape professionals, municipal planners, land managers, environmental/gardening groups, and individuals throughout the tri-state area. Founded in 1998 as the first affiliate of the lady bird johnson wildflower center in austin, Texas, the native plant center provides resources for environmental study; presents classes on sustainable gardening native plant identification, and ecological processes; hosts landscape conferences on timely environmental topics (i.e. Climate change, wildlife habitats, sustainable maintenance) that target professional audiences; presents to local, regional, and statewide community groups; gives tours of the native plant center teaching gardens; holds an annual sale, contributing thousands of native plants to the sustainability of our community; engages community involvement in the gardens through volunteer work days; and partners with other organizations and government agencies to promote and teach about the use of native plants.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 89% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.21; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 50 of 50 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $247K · 59 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $154K reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.